Measuring PA

Measuring PA

Subjective and Objective Measures

 Subjective measures of physically activity are less accurate because they rely on on a persons opinion and judgement of physical activity. Objective measures are unbiased measurements of physical activity.

What to look for when comparing instruments:

  • All common dimensions: Frequency, Duration, Intensity, Type, and Context
  • Energy expenditure measure in METS or calories/kilojoules
  • Expense; cost in dollars
  • Reactivity; level at which the measure biases the behaviour
  • The trade off between practicality and accuracy/validity. More practical measures such as subjective measures (e.g. recall) are practical but have a corresponding loss of accuracy.
  • Big groups= most practical measure needed, Individuals= most accurate measure
  • Participant burden, obtrusive, unobtrusive, non-invasive, small, lightweight etc.
  • Is it aerobic or walking only? Will it work for aquatic activities
  • Settings; can it be used in a variety of settings? Is it used in the laboratory or field?

 

SUBJECTIVE MEASURES OF PA

Advantages of Recall, Diaries or Logs:

-Can capture both qualitative and quantitative information

-Quick and easy for large groups

-Cost-effective for large studies

-Usually low participant burden

-Can assess physical activity across multiple domains

Disadvantages of Recall, Diaries or Logs:

-Not suitable for children under 10 or old adults due to cognitive limitations

-Reliability and validity problems; social desirability bias, memory limitations, misinterpretations of PA dimensions

-Interviewer may be needed

 

 

 

OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF PA

Advantages of Direct Observation:

-Excellent qualitative and quantitative information

-Allows for specific PA behaviours to be observed

-Can collect contextual information

-Useful in community and school

-Software; easy data collection

Disadvantages of Direct Observation:

-Difficult with large groups

-Obtrusive

-Time-intensive and labour-intensive

-May cause reactivity

 

Advantages of Heart-Rate Monitors:

-Strong association with energy expenditure

-Describes Frequency, Duration, Intensity

-Quick and easy data collection

-Valid in Lab and field-based settings

-Low participant burden (under 8h)

Disadvantages of Heart-Rate Monitors:

-Expensive for large groups

-Only useful for aerobic activities

-Influenced by other factors (e.g. stress)

-Changes in HR lag behind PA and can mask the sporadic nature of kids PA

-Some discomfort (extended periods)

Advantages of Pedometers:

-Inexpensive

-Small, lightweight, non-invasive

-Easy to administer for large groups

-Objective measure of most common PA (walking)

-Can promote behavioural change

-Can identify changes in rank-order

-Appropriate for all settings

Disadvantages of Pedometers:

- Assesses only one PA (walking, etc.)

-Can’t store data or record in real time

-Not appropriate for children as the pedometer misjudges locomotion.

 

 

 

Advantages of Accelerometers:

-Small, lightweight, non-invasive

-Describes Frequency, Duration, Intensity

-Low burden compared to HR monitors

-Good for children over self-reports

-Can be used in field or laboratory

-Records in real time, stores data

Disadvantages of Accelerometers:

-Expensive for large groups

-Cannot be worn during aquatic-based activities

-Can underestimate movement that is predominantly upper body

-Provides no contextual information

-Requires someone with knowledge to administer it

Advantages of Doubly labelled Water:

-Unobtrusive, non-invasive, any age group

-Calculates VO2

-Accurately measures energy expenditure

Disadvantages of Doubly labelled Water:

-Very expensive

-Provides no information about dimensions

-Provides no contextual information




Discussion




or
Connect with Facebook